Audience feedback questionnaire
1. On a scale of 1 to 10 how much do you think my magazine resembles those on the market?
(1= little similarity and 10= very similar)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2. If you saw the magazine in stores would you be interested in buying it?
Yes
No
3. Would you say that the cover of the magazine has enough detail inviting the viewer to read on?
Yes
No
4. Would you say that the magazine targets an audience of young adults with no specific preferences to what music they like?
Yes
No
5. Do you think that the branding of the magazine ‘Eclectic’ is effective for the target audience?
Yes
No
6. Do you think that the ‘Editors piece’ on the contents page is necessary?
Yes
No
7. Do you think that the contents page carries on the colour scheme and suits the layout of the rest of the magazine?
Yes
No
8. Do you think that the images are suitable for the magazine, using a range of shots and representing different types of artist?
Yes
No
9. Do you think that the article on ‘Mr Robinson’ is realistic?
Yes
No
10. Do you think that on the whole the colour scheme and layout of the magazine works well?
Yes
No
11. What is it that you like about the magazine?
12. What improvements would you make to the magazine?
Results










As I did with the questionnaire carried out before creating my magazine, I asked 30 people who would be the potential target audience some questions on what they thought of my magazine and any improvements that could be made. On the whole people generally liked my magazine and any negative comments that I got back were about similar things. When asking people how the magazine compared to those on the market the magazine didn’t score under 6 and most people said that they would be interested in buying the magazine, meaning that the magazine looks realistic. Most people thought that the branding of the magazine ‘ECLECTIC’ suited the genre of magazine, however, I had to explain to some people what it meant showing that it may not a suitable branding for all of the target audience.
Another comment that I got about the masthead saying that it looks as if would be seen on a rock music magazine. On the other hand this could be a good thing because when I asked if the magazine is suitable for my target audience a lot of people said that the audience was broad looking the contents page but didn’t cater enough for indie/rock music fans. However the aim of my magazine is to have articles for fans of all music and there are articles on rock bands and gigs. When asking about the images most people think that I haven’t used a very good range of shots or represented different artists. A comment that I got was that ‘looking at the artists in the pictures it seems that your targeting mainly girls but boys could read it too’, which wasn’t what I was aiming to do; I wanted it to look as if there was no identifiable audience. Therefore this is an area that I could improve on and I do this by maybe showing more images on the contents page and front cover and having images of rock, indie, Hip Hop artists and so on, making it appeal males.
The people that took my questionnaire mostly liked the layout and colour scheme that I chose as most people agreed that the cover looks inviting, the layout and colour scheme works and the contents page fits in to the magazine well. I had comments saying that, ‘the layout makes the layout look smart and not too overcrowded’ and ‘the colour scheme makes it easier to read and nothing clashes’. On content of the magazine most people believe that you can tell that there is a broad target audience looking at the contents page and that the article used on ‘Mr Robinson’ is realistic. So on the whole I got mainly good feedback on my magazine but there are still improvements that I would need to make to suit the target audience that I have chosen.
Overall i feedback from potential audiences was positive with only a few tips for improvements.






























